Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Clear Float Glass was classifiable under CTH 7005 10 90 where Chapter Note 2(c) established a microscopic absorbent, reflecting or non-reflecting metal coating; the Certificate of Origin could prove originating status but could not override classification under the Customs Tariff Act, so the benefit of Notification No. 46/2011-Cus. remained available even though the certificate mentioned CTH 7005 29 90. Because the goods were declared as Clear Float Glass and no misdeclaration or suppression was shown, the duty demand failed and confiscation, redemption fine, penalty and interest also fell away.
Clear Float Glass was classifiable under CTH 7005 10 90 where Chapter Note 2(c) established a microscopic absorbent, reflecting or non-reflecting metal coating; the Certificate of Origin could prove originating status but could not override classification under the Customs Tariff Act, so the benefit of Notification No. 46/2011-Cus. remained available even though the certificate mentioned CTH 7005 29 90. Because the goods were declared as Clear Float Glass and no misdeclaration or suppression was shown, the duty demand failed and confiscation, redemption fine, penalty and interest also fell away.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
