Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4800
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2601 to 2620 of 96000 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Clear Float Glass was classifiable under CTH 7005 10 90 where Chapter Note 2(c) established a microscopic absorbent, reflecting or non-reflecting metal coating; the Certificate of Origin could prove originating status but could not override classification under the Customs Tariff Act, so the benefit of Notification No. 46/2011-Cus. remained available even though the certificate mentioned CTH 7005 29 90. Because the goods were declared as Clear Float Glass and no misdeclaration or suppression was shown, the duty demand failed and confiscation, redemption fine, penalty and interest also fell away.
Clear Float Glass was classifiable under CTH 7005 10 90 where Chapter Note 2(c) established a microscopic absorbent, reflecting or non-reflecting metal coating; the Certificate of Origin could prove originating status but could not override classification under the Customs Tariff Act, so the benefit of Notification No. 46/2011-Cus. remained available even though the certificate mentioned CTH 7005 29 90. Because the goods were declared as Clear Float Glass and no misdeclaration or suppression was shown, the duty demand failed and confiscation, redemption fine, penalty and interest also fell away.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.