Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Clear Float Glass was classifiable under CTH 7005 10 90 where Chapter Note 2(c) established a microscopic absorbent, reflecting or non-reflecting metal coating; the Certificate of Origin could prove originating status but could not override classification under the Customs Tariff Act, so the benefit of Notification No. 46/2011-Cus. remained available even though the certificate mentioned CTH 7005 29 90. Because the goods were declared as Clear Float Glass and no misdeclaration or suppression was shown, the duty demand failed and confiscation, redemption fine, penalty and interest also fell away.
Clear Float Glass was classifiable under CTH 7005 10 90 where Chapter Note 2(c) established a microscopic absorbent, reflecting or non-reflecting metal coating; the Certificate of Origin could prove originating status but could not override classification under the Customs Tariff Act, so the benefit of Notification No. 46/2011-Cus. remained available even though the certificate mentioned CTH 7005 29 90. Because the goods were declared as Clear Float Glass and no misdeclaration or suppression was shown, the duty demand failed and confiscation, redemption fine, penalty and interest also fell away.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.