Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Clean slate principle bars revival of pre-CIRP electricity dues and the connected late payment surcharge after approval of a resolution plan. Where the surcharge had already arisen on unpaid electricity charges before CIRP, extinguishment of the principal pre-resolution claim also prevents indirect recovery of the related surcharge as a condition for restoring supply. Reliance on post-disconnection billing or section 56(2) concepts was misplaced because the liability had already been billed and formed part of the pre-CIRP dues. A demand for pre-CIRP surcharge as a precondition to a fresh electricity connection was therefore treated as arbitrary and without authority of law.
Clean slate principle bars revival of pre-CIRP electricity dues and the connected late payment surcharge after approval of a resolution plan. Where the surcharge had already arisen on unpaid electricity charges before CIRP, extinguishment of the principal pre-resolution claim also prevents indirect recovery of the related surcharge as a condition for restoring supply. Reliance on post-disconnection billing or section 56(2) concepts was misplaced because the liability had already been billed and formed part of the pre-CIRP dues. A demand for pre-CIRP surcharge as a precondition to a fresh electricity connection was therefore treated as arbitrary and without authority of law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
