Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Amounts paid under protest during provisional assessment were treated as revenue deposits, not duty, so Section 11B/11BB did not govern the refund or delay interest. Because the payment never acquired the character of duty and no pre-existing quantified liability existed, interest ran from each date of deposit until actual refund, not three months after the refund claim. The Tribunal also held that the proper rate was 12% per annum, with interest already paid to be adjusted.
Amounts paid under protest during provisional assessment were treated as revenue deposits, not duty, so Section 11B/11BB did not govern the refund or delay interest. Because the payment never acquired the character of duty and no pre-existing quantified liability existed, interest ran from each date of deposit until actual refund, not three months after the refund claim. The Tribunal also held that the proper rate was 12% per annum, with interest already paid to be adjusted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.