Proportionality in company penalty quantification requires aggravating and mitigating factors; mechanical multiplication of director liability is impe...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3261 to 3280 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Amounts paid under protest during provisional assessment were treated as revenue deposits, not duty, so Section 11B/11BB did not govern the refund or delay interest. Because the payment never acquired the character of duty and no pre-existing quantified liability existed, interest ran from each date of deposit until actual refund, not three months after the refund claim. The Tribunal also held that the proper rate was 12% per annum, with interest already paid to be adjusted.
Amounts paid under protest during provisional assessment were treated as revenue deposits, not duty, so Section 11B/11BB did not govern the refund or delay interest. Because the payment never acquired the character of duty and no pre-existing quantified liability existed, interest ran from each date of deposit until actual refund, not three months after the refund claim. The Tribunal also held that the proper rate was 12% per annum, with interest already paid to be adjusted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
