Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Amounts deposited under protest towards disputed central excise liability retained the character of duty and were refundable only under the statutory scheme in Section 11B; payment under protest merely removed the limitation bar and did not convert the sum into an independent revenue deposit carrying interest from the date of deposit. Interest on delayed refund was governed by Section 11BB and accrued only if refund was not made within three months of receipt of the refund application. Accordingly, interest at 6% was payable only after expiry of three months from the application dated 28.04.2025, and the claim for interest from the original deposit dates was rejected.
Amounts deposited under protest towards disputed central excise liability retained the character of duty and were refundable only under the statutory scheme in Section 11B; payment under protest merely removed the limitation bar and did not convert the sum into an independent revenue deposit carrying interest from the date of deposit. Interest on delayed refund was governed by Section 11BB and accrued only if refund was not made within three months of receipt of the refund application. Accordingly, interest at 6% was payable only after expiry of three months from the application dated 28.04.2025, and the claim for interest from the original deposit dates was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.