Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2701 to 2720 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Amounts deposited under protest towards disputed central excise liability retained the character of duty and were refundable only under the statutory scheme in Section 11B; payment under protest merely removed the limitation bar and did not convert the sum into an independent revenue deposit carrying interest from the date of deposit. Interest on delayed refund was governed by Section 11BB and accrued only if refund was not made within three months of receipt of the refund application. Accordingly, interest at 6% was payable only after expiry of three months from the application dated 28.04.2025, and the claim for interest from the original deposit dates was rejected.
Amounts deposited under protest towards disputed central excise liability retained the character of duty and were refundable only under the statutory scheme in Section 11B; payment under protest merely removed the limitation bar and did not convert the sum into an independent revenue deposit carrying interest from the date of deposit. Interest on delayed refund was governed by Section 11BB and accrued only if refund was not made within three months of receipt of the refund application. Accordingly, interest at 6% was payable only after expiry of three months from the application dated 28.04.2025, and the claim for interest from the original deposit dates was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
