Employee conflict disclosures and investment restrictions expand with new recusal duties, post-employment limits, and compliance reporting requirement...
Revenue-neutral domestic transfer pricing and mirror transactions justified deletion of related-party adjustments for operation, maintenance and port ...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1061 to 1080 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Notification No. 30/2004-CE exemption was held to remain available where the assessee had not originally taken CENVAT credit on exempt clearances, maintained separate accounts, and later reversed credit only after the Department required reversal under Rule 6(3). The prescribed reversal was treated as deemed non-availment of credit, so the later availment and reversal did not breach the exemption condition or justify duty demand on the exempted goods. The extended period of limitation was also held unavailable because the later demand rested on a change in the Department's earlier stand. The duty, interest and penalty demands were set aside.
Notification No. 30/2004-CE exemption was held to remain available where the assessee had not originally taken CENVAT credit on exempt clearances, maintained separate accounts, and later reversed credit only after the Department required reversal under Rule 6(3). The prescribed reversal was treated as deemed non-availment of credit, so the later availment and reversal did not breach the exemption condition or justify duty demand on the exempted goods. The extended period of limitation was also held unavailable because the later demand rested on a change in the Department's earlier stand. The duty, interest and penalty demands were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
