Habeas corpus challenge to arrest safeguards remains maintainable, but substantial compliance with reasons-to-believe requirement defeats the petition...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3081 to 3100 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Notification No. 30/2004-CE exemption was held to remain available where the assessee had not originally taken CENVAT credit on exempt clearances, maintained separate accounts, and later reversed credit only after the Department required reversal under Rule 6(3). The prescribed reversal was treated as deemed non-availment of credit, so the later availment and reversal did not breach the exemption condition or justify duty demand on the exempted goods. The extended period of limitation was also held unavailable because the later demand rested on a change in the Department's earlier stand. The duty, interest and penalty demands were set aside.
Notification No. 30/2004-CE exemption was held to remain available where the assessee had not originally taken CENVAT credit on exempt clearances, maintained separate accounts, and later reversed credit only after the Department required reversal under Rule 6(3). The prescribed reversal was treated as deemed non-availment of credit, so the later availment and reversal did not breach the exemption condition or justify duty demand on the exempted goods. The extended period of limitation was also held unavailable because the later demand rested on a change in the Department's earlier stand. The duty, interest and penalty demands were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
