Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Under GST, a personal hearing under Section 75(4) is required when a written request is made or when an adverse order is contemplated; the text states that this requirement was satisfied because the taxpayer was given three hearings after replying to the show cause notice, and its authorised representative treated the written defence as final at the last hearing. The challenge for denial of personal hearing was rejected, and a second hearing before the final adverse order was held unnecessary. The separate grievance on premature recovery was left open for further instructions.
Under GST, a personal hearing under Section 75(4) is required when a written request is made or when an adverse order is contemplated; the text states that this requirement was satisfied because the taxpayer was given three hearings after replying to the show cause notice, and its authorised representative treated the written defence as final at the last hearing. The challenge for denial of personal hearing was rejected, and a second hearing before the final adverse order was held unnecessary. The separate grievance on premature recovery was left open for further instructions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
