Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Under GST, a personal hearing under Section 75(4) is required when a written request is made or when an adverse order is contemplated; the text states that this requirement was satisfied because the taxpayer was given three hearings after replying to the show cause notice, and its authorised representative treated the written defence as final at the last hearing. The challenge for denial of personal hearing was rejected, and a second hearing before the final adverse order was held unnecessary. The separate grievance on premature recovery was left open for further instructions.
Under GST, a personal hearing under Section 75(4) is required when a written request is made or when an adverse order is contemplated; the text states that this requirement was satisfied because the taxpayer was given three hearings after replying to the show cause notice, and its authorised representative treated the written defence as final at the last hearing. The challenge for denial of personal hearing was rejected, and a second hearing before the final adverse order was held unnecessary. The separate grievance on premature recovery was left open for further instructions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
