Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Transfer pricing re-characterisation of redeemable preference share subscription and redemption as loans was rejected because earlier decisions in the assessee's own case had already held that, absent material showing sham or concealment of the real character, the TPO could not disregard the apparent transaction or impute notional interest. The interest disallowance on advances to sister concerns also failed because the Tribunal found sufficient own funds on the balance sheets, giving rise to a presumption that the advances came from those funds; that factual finding was not shown to be perverse. Both appeals were dismissed.
Transfer pricing re-characterisation of redeemable preference share subscription and redemption as loans was rejected because earlier decisions in the assessee's own case had already held that, absent material showing sham or concealment of the real character, the TPO could not disregard the apparent transaction or impute notional interest. The interest disallowance on advances to sister concerns also failed because the Tribunal found sufficient own funds on the balance sheets, giving rise to a presumption that the advances came from those funds; that factual finding was not shown to be perverse. Both appeals were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
