Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Interest earned by a co-operative credit society on temporarily parked business funds in bank deposits was treated as income attributable to its business of providing credit facilities to members, making it eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i). The Tribunal followed binding jurisdictional precedent, relied on Tumkur Merchants and later similar decisions, and distinguished Totgars because that ruling concerned retained sale proceeds payable to members, not business funds of a society exclusively engaged in credit activity. It also applied judicial discipline by following the Karnataka High Court over contrary views. On identical facts, the same deduction was extended to the other assessment years.
Interest earned by a co-operative credit society on temporarily parked business funds in bank deposits was treated as income attributable to its business of providing credit facilities to members, making it eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i). The Tribunal followed binding jurisdictional precedent, relied on Tumkur Merchants and later similar decisions, and distinguished Totgars because that ruling concerned retained sale proceeds payable to members, not business funds of a society exclusively engaged in credit activity. It also applied judicial discipline by following the Karnataka High Court over contrary views. On identical facts, the same deduction was extended to the other assessment years.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
