Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Interest earned by a co-operative credit society on temporarily parked business funds in bank deposits was treated as income attributable to its business of providing credit facilities to members, making it eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i). The Tribunal followed binding jurisdictional precedent, relied on Tumkur Merchants and later similar decisions, and distinguished Totgars because that ruling concerned retained sale proceeds payable to members, not business funds of a society exclusively engaged in credit activity. It also applied judicial discipline by following the Karnataka High Court over contrary views. On identical facts, the same deduction was extended to the other assessment years.
Interest earned by a co-operative credit society on temporarily parked business funds in bank deposits was treated as income attributable to its business of providing credit facilities to members, making it eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i). The Tribunal followed binding jurisdictional precedent, relied on Tumkur Merchants and later similar decisions, and distinguished Totgars because that ruling concerned retained sale proceeds payable to members, not business funds of a society exclusively engaged in credit activity. It also applied judicial discipline by following the Karnataka High Court over contrary views. On identical facts, the same deduction was extended to the other assessment years.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
