Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
241 to 260 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Interest earned by a co-operative credit society on temporarily parked business funds in bank deposits was treated as income attributable to its business of providing credit facilities to members, making it eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i). The Tribunal followed binding jurisdictional precedent, relied on Tumkur Merchants and later similar decisions, and distinguished Totgars because that ruling concerned retained sale proceeds payable to members, not business funds of a society exclusively engaged in credit activity. It also applied judicial discipline by following the Karnataka High Court over contrary views. On identical facts, the same deduction was extended to the other assessment years.
Interest earned by a co-operative credit society on temporarily parked business funds in bank deposits was treated as income attributable to its business of providing credit facilities to members, making it eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i). The Tribunal followed binding jurisdictional precedent, relied on Tumkur Merchants and later similar decisions, and distinguished Totgars because that ruling concerned retained sale proceeds payable to members, not business funds of a society exclusively engaged in credit activity. It also applied judicial discipline by following the Karnataka High Court over contrary views. On identical facts, the same deduction was extended to the other assessment years.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
