Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Quashment was refused where allegations of large-scale illegal mining, criminal conspiracy and connected PMLA laundering disclosed a prima facie case; disputed issues on valuation, quarried quantity, competing committee reports and the exact loss to the State were held to be matters for trial, not for threshold interference. The later committee report, prepared for damage assessment and not accepted for criminal liability, did not by itself end either the predicate offences or the PMLA complaint. Statements under Section 161 CrPC, claims of tutoring and the women partners' later retirement from the firm were also treated as trial issues, and the prosecution was allowed to continue.
Quashment was refused where allegations of large-scale illegal mining, criminal conspiracy and connected PMLA laundering disclosed a prima facie case; disputed issues on valuation, quarried quantity, competing committee reports and the exact loss to the State were held to be matters for trial, not for threshold interference. The later committee report, prepared for damage assessment and not accepted for criminal liability, did not by itself end either the predicate offences or the PMLA complaint. Statements under Section 161 CrPC, claims of tutoring and the women partners' later retirement from the firm were also treated as trial issues, and the prosecution was allowed to continue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.