Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 96136 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Quashment was refused where allegations of large-scale illegal mining, criminal conspiracy and connected PMLA laundering disclosed a prima facie case; disputed issues on valuation, quarried quantity, competing committee reports and the exact loss to the State were held to be matters for trial, not for threshold interference. The later committee report, prepared for damage assessment and not accepted for criminal liability, did not by itself end either the predicate offences or the PMLA complaint. Statements under Section 161 CrPC, claims of tutoring and the women partners' later retirement from the firm were also treated as trial issues, and the prosecution was allowed to continue.
Quashment was refused where allegations of large-scale illegal mining, criminal conspiracy and connected PMLA laundering disclosed a prima facie case; disputed issues on valuation, quarried quantity, competing committee reports and the exact loss to the State were held to be matters for trial, not for threshold interference. The later committee report, prepared for damage assessment and not accepted for criminal liability, did not by itself end either the predicate offences or the PMLA complaint. Statements under Section 161 CrPC, claims of tutoring and the women partners' later retirement from the firm were also treated as trial issues, and the prosecution was allowed to continue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
