Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
241 to 260 of 96091 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Minimum Average Balance maintained by bank customers was treated as a contractual condition, not consideration for banking services, so the service tax demand on that basis was contrary to the Finance Act and the Supreme Court's approach in Bhayana Builders. The text also notes that the Board's circulars required a sufficient nexus between the promise and any benefit received by the bank, and that identical GST proceedings against another bank were dropped on the same reasoning. On writ maintainability, the challenge to show-cause notices raised a pure question of law and jurisdictional facts, so the alternative-remedy objection was rejected and the notices were quashed.
Minimum Average Balance maintained by bank customers was treated as a contractual condition, not consideration for banking services, so the service tax demand on that basis was contrary to the Finance Act and the Supreme Court's approach in Bhayana Builders. The text also notes that the Board's circulars required a sufficient nexus between the promise and any benefit received by the bank, and that identical GST proceedings against another bank were dropped on the same reasoning. On writ maintainability, the challenge to show-cause notices raised a pure question of law and jurisdictional facts, so the alternative-remedy objection was rejected and the notices were quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.