Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Minimum Average Balance maintained by bank customers was treated as a contractual condition, not consideration for banking services, so the service tax demand on that basis was contrary to the Finance Act and the Supreme Court's approach in Bhayana Builders. The text also notes that the Board's circulars required a sufficient nexus between the promise and any benefit received by the bank, and that identical GST proceedings against another bank were dropped on the same reasoning. On writ maintainability, the challenge to show-cause notices raised a pure question of law and jurisdictional facts, so the alternative-remedy objection was rejected and the notices were quashed.
Minimum Average Balance maintained by bank customers was treated as a contractual condition, not consideration for banking services, so the service tax demand on that basis was contrary to the Finance Act and the Supreme Court's approach in Bhayana Builders. The text also notes that the Board's circulars required a sufficient nexus between the promise and any benefit received by the bank, and that identical GST proceedings against another bank were dropped on the same reasoning. On writ maintainability, the challenge to show-cause notices raised a pure question of law and jurisdictional facts, so the alternative-remedy objection was rejected and the notices were quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.