Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Section 9D was treated as a mandatory safeguard for using investigation statements in adjudication, requiring witness examination, recorded satisfaction for dispensing with it, and an opportunity for cross-examination; the statements were therefore inadmissible. Section 36B was also held to be a complete code for computer-derived records, and the absence of the required certificate and foundational proof made the seized papers and charts inadmissible. As no independent corroborative evidence established clandestine manufacture or removal, the duty demand, interest and equal penalty could not stand and were set aside.
Section 9D was treated as a mandatory safeguard for using investigation statements in adjudication, requiring witness examination, recorded satisfaction for dispensing with it, and an opportunity for cross-examination; the statements were therefore inadmissible. Section 36B was also held to be a complete code for computer-derived records, and the absence of the required certificate and foundational proof made the seized papers and charts inadmissible. As no independent corroborative evidence established clandestine manufacture or removal, the duty demand, interest and equal penalty could not stand and were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
