Mark-to-Market losses on principal-protected debentures are deductible as business expenditure when the obligation is crystallized under mercantile ac...
Deferred Payment of Customs Duty extended to Eligible Manufacturer Importers with electronic registration and ICEGATE authentication for conditional c...
Tariff classification determines GST schedule and rate; beverages in Schedule III attract the higher rate, tea extracts and syrups in Schedule I attra...
Fraudulent trading requires cogent evidence of intent to defraud; ordinary-course payments protected, except post-insolvency withdrawals must be resto...
Non-consideration of an applicable departmental circular can vitiate tax adjudication where the circular governs the dispute. Here, the HC found that the adjudicating authority had not considered the Circular dated 27.12.2022 in an input tax credit discrepancy matter for the 2017-18 period. Treating that omission as sufficient to interfere, the Court set aside the adjudication order, summary order and consequential letter, and remitted the matter for fresh consideration in accordance with law, with liberty to the petitioner to place additional material.
Non-consideration of an applicable departmental circular can vitiate tax adjudication where the circular governs the dispute. Here, the HC found that the adjudicating authority had not considered the Circular dated 27.12.2022 in an input tax credit discrepancy matter for the 2017-18 period. Treating that omission as sufficient to interfere, the Court set aside the adjudication order, summary order and consequential letter, and remitted the matter for fresh consideration in accordance with law, with liberty to the petitioner to place additional material.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.