Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Non-consideration of an applicable departmental circular can vitiate tax adjudication where the circular governs the dispute. Here, the HC found that the adjudicating authority had not considered the Circular dated 27.12.2022 in an input tax credit discrepancy matter for the 2017-18 period. Treating that omission as sufficient to interfere, the Court set aside the adjudication order, summary order and consequential letter, and remitted the matter for fresh consideration in accordance with law, with liberty to the petitioner to place additional material.
Non-consideration of an applicable departmental circular can vitiate tax adjudication where the circular governs the dispute. Here, the HC found that the adjudicating authority had not considered the Circular dated 27.12.2022 in an input tax credit discrepancy matter for the 2017-18 period. Treating that omission as sufficient to interfere, the Court set aside the adjudication order, summary order and consequential letter, and remitted the matter for fresh consideration in accordance with law, with liberty to the petitioner to place additional material.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.