Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Coercive recovery of the tax demand was restrained during pendency of the assessee's appeal because the tax auditor had issued a clarification that the Form-3CD figures reflected a technical or typographical error, and a revised Form-3CD with corrected figures had been filed. As the assessment order and demand were under appellate challenge, the court protected the assessee from recovery action until the appeal was decided, while leaving the merits to the appellate authority. The appeal was also directed to be disposed of expeditiously so the corrected figures could be considered in due course.
Coercive recovery of the tax demand was restrained during pendency of the assessee's appeal because the tax auditor had issued a clarification that the Form-3CD figures reflected a technical or typographical error, and a revised Form-3CD with corrected figures had been filed. As the assessment order and demand were under appellate challenge, the court protected the assessee from recovery action until the appeal was decided, while leaving the merits to the appellate authority. The appeal was also directed to be disposed of expeditiously so the corrected figures could be considered in due course.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
