Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Coercive recovery of the tax demand was restrained during pendency of the assessee's appeal because the tax auditor had issued a clarification that the Form-3CD figures reflected a technical or typographical error, and a revised Form-3CD with corrected figures had been filed. As the assessment order and demand were under appellate challenge, the court protected the assessee from recovery action until the appeal was decided, while leaving the merits to the appellate authority. The appeal was also directed to be disposed of expeditiously so the corrected figures could be considered in due course.
Coercive recovery of the tax demand was restrained during pendency of the assessee's appeal because the tax auditor had issued a clarification that the Form-3CD figures reflected a technical or typographical error, and a revised Form-3CD with corrected figures had been filed. As the assessment order and demand were under appellate challenge, the court protected the assessee from recovery action until the appeal was decided, while leaving the merits to the appellate authority. The appeal was also directed to be disposed of expeditiously so the corrected figures could be considered in due course.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
