Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
An ex parte revision order under section 263 was held unsustainable because the assessee received only one day to respond to the show-cause notice, which was treated as denial of a reasonable opportunity of hearing and a breach of audi alteram partem. By majority, the Tribunal held that the defect was procedural and curable, so the revision proceedings were not terminated; the impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication after adequate opportunity, uninfluenced by observations on merits.
An ex parte revision order under section 263 was held unsustainable because the assessee received only one day to respond to the show-cause notice, which was treated as denial of a reasonable opportunity of hearing and a breach of audi alteram partem. By majority, the Tribunal held that the defect was procedural and curable, so the revision proceedings were not terminated; the impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication after adequate opportunity, uninfluenced by observations on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.