Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
A credit cooperative society's interest on deposits or investments with cooperative banks was treated as business income attributable to its activity of accepting deposits and extending credit to members. The Tribunal held that deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) was available because the interest was not excluded merely due to its source, and the relevant Karnataka High Court precedents supported the assessee on closely similar facts. Where conflicting High Court decisions were cited, the Tribunal followed the view with facts closer to the present case and directed allowance of the deduction on the interest income.
A credit cooperative society's interest on deposits or investments with cooperative banks was treated as business income attributable to its activity of accepting deposits and extending credit to members. The Tribunal held that deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) was available because the interest was not excluded merely due to its source, and the relevant Karnataka High Court precedents supported the assessee on closely similar facts. Where conflicting High Court decisions were cited, the Tribunal followed the view with facts closer to the present case and directed allowance of the deduction on the interest income.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
