Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Loose papers that are undated, unsigned and unlinked to the assessee cannot, by themselves, support additions for unexplained investment under section 69; the Tribunal treated the paper as a dumb document and deleted the addition. A figure on the same paper also could not be taxed as unexplained money under section 69A because no money or other valuable asset was found in the assessee's ownership, and the nature of the entry was not established; that addition was deleted. A gross profit addition based only on alleged stock shortage was rejected because the assessee gave a plausible job-work explanation that was not disproved. Third-party WhatsApp and police material could not be used without full disclosure or cross-examination, so the betting-related section 69A addition also failed.
Loose papers that are undated, unsigned and unlinked to the assessee cannot, by themselves, support additions for unexplained investment under section 69; the Tribunal treated the paper as a dumb document and deleted the addition. A figure on the same paper also could not be taxed as unexplained money under section 69A because no money or other valuable asset was found in the assessee's ownership, and the nature of the entry was not established; that addition was deleted. A gross profit addition based only on alleged stock shortage was rejected because the assessee gave a plausible job-work explanation that was not disproved. Third-party WhatsApp and police material could not be used without full disclosure or cross-examination, so the betting-related section 69A addition also failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.