Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1081 to 1100 of 95916 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Enhancement in reassessment could not bring to tax long-term capital gain from sale of the Manesar property as a new source of income when reopening was confined to unexplained investment in the Panchkula property; the Tribunal held that appellate enhancement does not extend to an altogether new source and deleted the addition. It also held that the Manesar asset was a residential house property, supported by the sale deed, occupation certificate, approved plans and loan records, so indexed cost of construction or improvement was allowable. On the exemption claim, substantial investment in a new residential house within the prescribed period entitled the assessee to deduction under sections 54/54F despite no deposit in the Capital Gain Account Scheme.
Enhancement in reassessment could not bring to tax long-term capital gain from sale of the Manesar property as a new source of income when reopening was confined to unexplained investment in the Panchkula property; the Tribunal held that appellate enhancement does not extend to an altogether new source and deleted the addition. It also held that the Manesar asset was a residential house property, supported by the sale deed, occupation certificate, approved plans and loan records, so indexed cost of construction or improvement was allowable. On the exemption claim, substantial investment in a new residential house within the prescribed period entitled the assessee to deduction under sections 54/54F despite no deposit in the Capital Gain Account Scheme.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
