Timing mismatch in income recognition requires verification whether receipts were already taxed in an earlier year; matter remitted for fresh examinat...
FOB transaction value and export incentives: customs valuation cannot override contractual export benefits or support confiscation without valid proof...
Explanation 4 to section 28 preserved the pre-amendment customs recovery regime for notices issued before 29-03-2018, so the later supplementary-notice mechanism under section 28(7A) and the 2019 Regulations could not be applied to a 2014 show cause notice. A corrigendum adding fresh allegations and evidence after completion of the final hearing could not be treated as a valid supplement to the notice and had to be ignored at final adjudication. The writ petition was allowed, and the final order was directed to be passed on the original notice without considering the corrigendum.
Explanation 4 to section 28 preserved the pre-amendment customs recovery regime for notices issued before 29-03-2018, so the later supplementary-notice mechanism under section 28(7A) and the 2019 Regulations could not be applied to a 2014 show cause notice. A corrigendum adding fresh allegations and evidence after completion of the final hearing could not be treated as a valid supplement to the notice and had to be ignored at final adjudication. The writ petition was allowed, and the final order was directed to be passed on the original notice without considering the corrigendum.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
