Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Explanation 4 to section 28 preserved the pre-amendment customs recovery regime for notices issued before 29-03-2018, so the later supplementary-notice mechanism under section 28(7A) and the 2019 Regulations could not be applied to a 2014 show cause notice. A corrigendum adding fresh allegations and evidence after completion of the final hearing could not be treated as a valid supplement to the notice and had to be ignored at final adjudication. The writ petition was allowed, and the final order was directed to be passed on the original notice without considering the corrigendum.
Explanation 4 to section 28 preserved the pre-amendment customs recovery regime for notices issued before 29-03-2018, so the later supplementary-notice mechanism under section 28(7A) and the 2019 Regulations could not be applied to a 2014 show cause notice. A corrigendum adding fresh allegations and evidence after completion of the final hearing could not be treated as a valid supplement to the notice and had to be ignored at final adjudication. The writ petition was allowed, and the final order was directed to be passed on the original notice without considering the corrigendum.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
