Revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 upheld; faceless assessments subject to revision when AO fails requisite enquiries, remitted for fresh asse...
Limited scope of processing under section 143(1): enhancement without show cause is unsustainable; remand for residency, taxation and TDS verification...
Section 110(1) customs seizure requires a reason to believe, based on relevant material, that goods are liable to confiscation under Section 111; mere suspicion is insufficient. In the areca nuts matter, the record contained tax invoices, GST payment details and an e-way bill supporting lawful intra-State movement, while the seizure inventory and laboratory report did not show foreign origin. The seizure of the goods and truck was therefore without jurisdiction, and release was directed unless fresh material later emerged.
Section 110(1) customs seizure requires a reason to believe, based on relevant material, that goods are liable to confiscation under Section 111; mere suspicion is insufficient. In the areca nuts matter, the record contained tax invoices, GST payment details and an e-way bill supporting lawful intra-State movement, while the seizure inventory and laboratory report did not show foreign origin. The seizure of the goods and truck was therefore without jurisdiction, and release was directed unless fresh material later emerged.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.