Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Page of 4800
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
681 to 700 of 95999 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Glucometers are classifiable under CTH 9027 as instruments for physical or chemical analysis because they measure blood glucose by analysing the chemical or enzymatic reaction on the test strip and converting it into a reading. Their medical use does not move them to CTH 9018 where a more specific analytical entry fits, and the device's blood-glucose measurement itself is a diagnostic step. The Tribunal followed earlier CESTAT, Bombay High Court and Supreme Court order authority, upheld the Commissioner (Appeals), and rejected the Revenue's claim for classification under CTH 90189099.
Glucometers are classifiable under CTH 9027 as instruments for physical or chemical analysis because they measure blood glucose by analysing the chemical or enzymatic reaction on the test strip and converting it into a reading. Their medical use does not move them to CTH 9018 where a more specific analytical entry fits, and the device's blood-glucose measurement itself is a diagnostic step. The Tribunal followed earlier CESTAT, Bombay High Court and Supreme Court order authority, upheld the Commissioner (Appeals), and rejected the Revenue's claim for classification under CTH 90189099.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.