Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Glucometers are classifiable under CTH 9027 as instruments for physical or chemical analysis because they measure blood glucose by analysing the chemical or enzymatic reaction on the test strip and converting it into a reading. Their medical use does not move them to CTH 9018 where a more specific analytical entry fits, and the device's blood-glucose measurement itself is a diagnostic step. The Tribunal followed earlier CESTAT, Bombay High Court and Supreme Court order authority, upheld the Commissioner (Appeals), and rejected the Revenue's claim for classification under CTH 90189099.
Glucometers are classifiable under CTH 9027 as instruments for physical or chemical analysis because they measure blood glucose by analysing the chemical or enzymatic reaction on the test strip and converting it into a reading. Their medical use does not move them to CTH 9018 where a more specific analytical entry fits, and the device's blood-glucose measurement itself is a diagnostic step. The Tribunal followed earlier CESTAT, Bombay High Court and Supreme Court order authority, upheld the Commissioner (Appeals), and rejected the Revenue's claim for classification under CTH 90189099.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.