Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Glucometers are classifiable under CTH 9027 as instruments for physical or chemical analysis because they measure blood glucose by analysing the chemical or enzymatic reaction on the test strip and converting it into a reading. Their medical use does not move them to CTH 9018 where a more specific analytical entry fits, and the device's blood-glucose measurement itself is a diagnostic step. The Tribunal followed earlier CESTAT, Bombay High Court and Supreme Court order authority, upheld the Commissioner (Appeals), and rejected the Revenue's claim for classification under CTH 90189099.
Glucometers are classifiable under CTH 9027 as instruments for physical or chemical analysis because they measure blood glucose by analysing the chemical or enzymatic reaction on the test strip and converting it into a reading. Their medical use does not move them to CTH 9018 where a more specific analytical entry fits, and the device's blood-glucose measurement itself is a diagnostic step. The Tribunal followed earlier CESTAT, Bombay High Court and Supreme Court order authority, upheld the Commissioner (Appeals), and rejected the Revenue's claim for classification under CTH 90189099.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.