Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
CESTAT held that imported Christmas lights could not be reassessed on NIDB data alone. The Department had not shown valid reasons to reject the declared transaction value or followed the prescribed customs valuation procedure, so selective enhancement of value was unsustainable. Relying on its earlier ruling, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)' direction to assess the goods at the declared invoice value and dismissed the Revenue's appeal.
CESTAT held that imported Christmas lights could not be reassessed on NIDB data alone. The Department had not shown valid reasons to reject the declared transaction value or followed the prescribed customs valuation procedure, so selective enhancement of value was unsustainable. Relying on its earlier ruling, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)' direction to assess the goods at the declared invoice value and dismissed the Revenue's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.