Fraud-based GST assessment cannot stand without allegations of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression; proceedings must follow normal classificatio...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1121 to 1140 of 95872 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 50(3) governs interest where input tax credit is wrongly availed and utilised, and it prevails over the general rule in Section 50(1). The text states that the expression is not confined to fraudulent or bad-faith claims; any credit taken and used without entitlement falls within it. A mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A may justify treating credit as ineligible, and Rule 88B(3) requires interest to be computed from utilisation until reversal or payment. Because the utilisation occurs through the electronic credit ledger, the cash-ledger limitation in Section 50(1) does not apply, and the levy of interest is sustained.
Section 50(3) governs interest where input tax credit is wrongly availed and utilised, and it prevails over the general rule in Section 50(1). The text states that the expression is not confined to fraudulent or bad-faith claims; any credit taken and used without entitlement falls within it. A mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A may justify treating credit as ineligible, and Rule 88B(3) requires interest to be computed from utilisation until reversal or payment. Because the utilisation occurs through the electronic credit ledger, the cash-ledger limitation in Section 50(1) does not apply, and the levy of interest is sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.