Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Under section 73, a summary in Form DRC-01 cannot replace the statutory show cause notice, and notice, statement and order must be issued and authenticated by the proper officer. The text notes that non-compliance makes the initiation ineffective, leading to quashing of the order in original while preserving the summary already issued and allowing a fresh notice. For de novo proceedings, the fresh notice relates back to the date of the summary, and the intervening period is excluded while computing limitation for passing the adjudication order.
Under section 73, a summary in Form DRC-01 cannot replace the statutory show cause notice, and notice, statement and order must be issued and authenticated by the proper officer. The text notes that non-compliance makes the initiation ineffective, leading to quashing of the order in original while preserving the summary already issued and allowing a fresh notice. For de novo proceedings, the fresh notice relates back to the date of the summary, and the intervening period is excluded while computing limitation for passing the adjudication order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.