Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
A claim for reimbursement of GST paid on works contracts was treated as a contractual dispute turning on the terms of the agreement and underlying facts; the HC declined to examine it in writ jurisdiction. As adjudication of whether the contractor was entitled to reimbursement would require factual inquiry into the contract between the parties, the Court found the petition unsuitable for writ relief and dismissed it. The petitioners were left free to pursue other alternate remedies.
A claim for reimbursement of GST paid on works contracts was treated as a contractual dispute turning on the terms of the agreement and underlying facts; the HC declined to examine it in writ jurisdiction. As adjudication of whether the contractor was entitled to reimbursement would require factual inquiry into the contract between the parties, the Court found the petition unsuitable for writ relief and dismissed it. The petitioners were left free to pursue other alternate remedies.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
