Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
A claim for reimbursement of GST paid on works contracts was treated as a contractual dispute turning on the terms of the agreement and underlying facts; the HC declined to examine it in writ jurisdiction. As adjudication of whether the contractor was entitled to reimbursement would require factual inquiry into the contract between the parties, the Court found the petition unsuitable for writ relief and dismissed it. The petitioners were left free to pursue other alternate remedies.
A claim for reimbursement of GST paid on works contracts was treated as a contractual dispute turning on the terms of the agreement and underlying facts; the HC declined to examine it in writ jurisdiction. As adjudication of whether the contractor was entitled to reimbursement would require factual inquiry into the contract between the parties, the Court found the petition unsuitable for writ relief and dismissed it. The petitioners were left free to pursue other alternate remedies.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.