Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Penalty for cash receipts is attracted only when the receipt falls within one of the three statutory situations under section 269ST: receipt from a person in a day, receipt for a single transaction, or receipt relating to one event or occasion. The note explains that admitted cash sales, or an assessment completed by estimating profit on those sales, are not enough by themselves; the penalty order must record facts showing the specific statutory breach. In the absence of such findings, levy of penalty under section 271DA is unjustified, and the same reasoning applies where the facts and issue are identical across years.
Penalty for cash receipts is attracted only when the receipt falls within one of the three statutory situations under section 269ST: receipt from a person in a day, receipt for a single transaction, or receipt relating to one event or occasion. The note explains that admitted cash sales, or an assessment completed by estimating profit on those sales, are not enough by themselves; the penalty order must record facts showing the specific statutory breach. In the absence of such findings, levy of penalty under section 271DA is unjustified, and the same reasoning applies where the facts and issue are identical across years.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.