Proportionality in company penalty quantification requires aggravating and mitigating factors; mechanical multiplication of director liability is impe...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3261 to 3280 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty for cash receipts is attracted only when the receipt falls within one of the three statutory situations under section 269ST: receipt from a person in a day, receipt for a single transaction, or receipt relating to one event or occasion. The note explains that admitted cash sales, or an assessment completed by estimating profit on those sales, are not enough by themselves; the penalty order must record facts showing the specific statutory breach. In the absence of such findings, levy of penalty under section 271DA is unjustified, and the same reasoning applies where the facts and issue are identical across years.
Penalty for cash receipts is attracted only when the receipt falls within one of the three statutory situations under section 269ST: receipt from a person in a day, receipt for a single transaction, or receipt relating to one event or occasion. The note explains that admitted cash sales, or an assessment completed by estimating profit on those sales, are not enough by themselves; the penalty order must record facts showing the specific statutory breach. In the absence of such findings, levy of penalty under section 271DA is unjustified, and the same reasoning applies where the facts and issue are identical across years.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
