Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Where consideration for immovable property is paid wholly or partly through banking channels on or before the allotment or agreement date, the proviso to section 56(2)(x)(b)(B) requires stamp duty value to be taken as on that date, not the registration date. The lower authorities' reliance on registration-date valuation was treated as inconsistent with that proviso. Because the assessee produced a ready reckoner extract and valuation report relevant to the allotment date, that material was admitted as additional evidence, and the matter was sent back for verification of the valuation and fresh decision after hearing the assessee.
Where consideration for immovable property is paid wholly or partly through banking channels on or before the allotment or agreement date, the proviso to section 56(2)(x)(b)(B) requires stamp duty value to be taken as on that date, not the registration date. The lower authorities' reliance on registration-date valuation was treated as inconsistent with that proviso. Because the assessee produced a ready reckoner extract and valuation report relevant to the allotment date, that material was admitted as additional evidence, and the matter was sent back for verification of the valuation and fresh decision after hearing the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
