Section 10A and related deductions: Tribunal rejects separate-undertaking claim, but allows loss set-off, ESOP cost and foreign tax credit in principl...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4201 to 4220 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
For fees for technical services, the Tribunal held that the domestic rate under section 115A(1)(b) applied because the remittance was within the RBI automatic route and no separate approval was required on the facts. It construed the approval condition practically, not as a barrier that would make compliance impossible, and applied section 90(2) to permit the assessee to use the more beneficial 10% domestic rate instead of the treaty rate. The education cess ground was dismissed as already settled against the assessee, and interest was treated as consequential.
For fees for technical services, the Tribunal held that the domestic rate under section 115A(1)(b) applied because the remittance was within the RBI automatic route and no separate approval was required on the facts. It construed the approval condition practically, not as a barrier that would make compliance impossible, and applied section 90(2) to permit the assessee to use the more beneficial 10% domestic rate instead of the treaty rate. The education cess ground was dismissed as already settled against the assessee, and interest was treated as consequential.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.