Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
241 to 260 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
For fees for technical services, the Tribunal held that the domestic rate under section 115A(1)(b) applied because the remittance was within the RBI automatic route and no separate approval was required on the facts. It construed the approval condition practically, not as a barrier that would make compliance impossible, and applied section 90(2) to permit the assessee to use the more beneficial 10% domestic rate instead of the treaty rate. The education cess ground was dismissed as already settled against the assessee, and interest was treated as consequential.
For fees for technical services, the Tribunal held that the domestic rate under section 115A(1)(b) applied because the remittance was within the RBI automatic route and no separate approval was required on the facts. It construed the approval condition practically, not as a barrier that would make compliance impossible, and applied section 90(2) to permit the assessee to use the more beneficial 10% domestic rate instead of the treaty rate. The education cess ground was dismissed as already settled against the assessee, and interest was treated as consequential.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.