Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
For fees for technical services, the Tribunal held that the domestic rate under section 115A(1)(b) applied because the remittance was within the RBI automatic route and no separate approval was required on the facts. It construed the approval condition practically, not as a barrier that would make compliance impossible, and applied section 90(2) to permit the assessee to use the more beneficial 10% domestic rate instead of the treaty rate. The education cess ground was dismissed as already settled against the assessee, and interest was treated as consequential.
For fees for technical services, the Tribunal held that the domestic rate under section 115A(1)(b) applied because the remittance was within the RBI automatic route and no separate approval was required on the facts. It construed the approval condition practically, not as a barrier that would make compliance impossible, and applied section 90(2) to permit the assessee to use the more beneficial 10% domestic rate instead of the treaty rate. The education cess ground was dismissed as already settled against the assessee, and interest was treated as consequential.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.