Personal hearing requirements in GST adjudication were satisfied by prior opportunities and written submissions; appellate limitation received writ-pe...
Interactive flat panels meeting automatic data processing conditions are distinguished from monitors, while later classification clarifications apply ...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
761 to 780 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Territorial jurisdiction defect rendered the assessment invalid where the assessee's case remained with the Mumbai Assessing Officer and no transfer order for the relevant year was shown. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had been assessed by Mumbai in the preceding and succeeding years, and that the Delhi Assessing Officer therefore lacked authority to frame the order. It further held that the bar on belated objections to jurisdiction did not cure an inherent lack of jurisdiction, so the impugned orders were set aside and the other grounds were left academic.
Territorial jurisdiction defect rendered the assessment invalid where the assessee's case remained with the Mumbai Assessing Officer and no transfer order for the relevant year was shown. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had been assessed by Mumbai in the preceding and succeeding years, and that the Delhi Assessing Officer therefore lacked authority to frame the order. It further held that the bar on belated objections to jurisdiction did not cure an inherent lack of jurisdiction, so the impugned orders were set aside and the other grounds were left academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.