Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Territorial jurisdiction defect rendered the assessment invalid where the assessee's case remained with the Mumbai Assessing Officer and no transfer order for the relevant year was shown. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had been assessed by Mumbai in the preceding and succeeding years, and that the Delhi Assessing Officer therefore lacked authority to frame the order. It further held that the bar on belated objections to jurisdiction did not cure an inherent lack of jurisdiction, so the impugned orders were set aside and the other grounds were left academic.
Territorial jurisdiction defect rendered the assessment invalid where the assessee's case remained with the Mumbai Assessing Officer and no transfer order for the relevant year was shown. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had been assessed by Mumbai in the preceding and succeeding years, and that the Delhi Assessing Officer therefore lacked authority to frame the order. It further held that the bar on belated objections to jurisdiction did not cure an inherent lack of jurisdiction, so the impugned orders were set aside and the other grounds were left academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.