Revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 upheld; faceless assessments subject to revision when AO fails requisite enquiries, remitted for fresh asse...
Limited scope of processing under section 143(1): enhancement without show cause is unsustainable; remand for residency, taxation and TDS verification...
Alleged bogus purchases could not justify an ad hoc gross profit addition where the suppliers' non-filing of returns was the only adverse feature, the purchases were recorded in the books, and no contrary material disproved them; the gross profit-based addition was deleted. On alleged unaccounted sales, only the profit element could be taxed, so the Tribunal sustained addition at a net profit rate of 4% rather than taxing the full sale proceeds. Cash entry-fee receipts were extrapolated from a short period, so the addition was restricted to 25%. Separate unexplained expenditure was telescoped against the estimated undisclosed income and deleted, and section 69C could not apply to recorded purchases paid through banking channels.
Alleged bogus purchases could not justify an ad hoc gross profit addition where the suppliers' non-filing of returns was the only adverse feature, the purchases were recorded in the books, and no contrary material disproved them; the gross profit-based addition was deleted. On alleged unaccounted sales, only the profit element could be taxed, so the Tribunal sustained addition at a net profit rate of 4% rather than taxing the full sale proceeds. Cash entry-fee receipts were extrapolated from a short period, so the addition was restricted to 25%. Separate unexplained expenditure was telescoped against the estimated undisclosed income and deleted, and section 69C could not apply to recorded purchases paid through banking channels.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
