Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Consequential transfer pricing orders were held time-barred because the limitation period depended on the nature of the earlier appellate directions. Where the prior Tribunal order sent the issues on advances to associated enterprises and interest on outstanding receivables back for verification, hearing, and application of directions, the matter was treated as a fresh assessment on remand under section 153(3), with the second proviso to section 153(5) leading to the same result. Where the arm's length commission on corporate guarantees had already been conclusively fixed at 0.5% and only implementation remained, section 153(5) applied. In both situations, the consequential orders passed on 06.12.2024 were beyond time and were set aside.
Consequential transfer pricing orders were held time-barred because the limitation period depended on the nature of the earlier appellate directions. Where the prior Tribunal order sent the issues on advances to associated enterprises and interest on outstanding receivables back for verification, hearing, and application of directions, the matter was treated as a fresh assessment on remand under section 153(3), with the second proviso to section 153(5) leading to the same result. Where the arm's length commission on corporate guarantees had already been conclusively fixed at 0.5% and only implementation remained, section 153(5) applied. In both situations, the consequential orders passed on 06.12.2024 were beyond time and were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.